Current:Home > ContactJudge calls out Texas' contradictory arguments in battle over border barriers -MoneyStream
Judge calls out Texas' contradictory arguments in battle over border barriers
View
Date:2025-04-19 07:00:33
The Justice Department is likely to succeed on its claim that floating barriers Texas deployed in the Rio Grande to prevent migrants from crossing were illegally installed, a federal judge in Austin ruled -- adding the arguments used to justify the buoys are “unconvincing” and, in at least one instance, unconstitutional.
Judge David Alan Ezra ordered the Lonestar state to move its buoys on Wednesday and said the Justice Department is likely to prevail on its claim that Texas lacked proper authority to install them in the first place and that the state had employed "unconvincing" and conflicting rationale in doing so.
The ruling grants a preliminary injunction to the Department of Justice, which sued Texas for placing the buoys in the Rio Grande in July.
"Governor Abbott announced that he was not 'asking for permission' for Operation Lone Star, the anti-immigration program under which Texas constructed the floating barrier," Ezra wrote. "Unfortunately for Texas, permission is exactly what federal law requires before installing obstructions in the nation's navigable waters."
MORE: Trump may seek to have his Georgia election interference case removed to federal court
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has said the state will appeal the ruling, calling it "incorrect."
Judge Ezra's order gave the state until Sept. 15 to coordinate with the Army Corps of Engineers to move the buoys -- but Thursday, a U.S. Appeals Court granted a temporary stay allowing Texas to keep the buoys in place -- at least for now.
"We will continue to utilize every strategy to secure the border, including deploying Texas National Guard soldiers and Department of Public Safety troopers and installing strategic barriers," Abbott said in a statement Wednesday. "Our battle to defend Texas' sovereign authority to protect lives from the chaos caused by President Biden's open border policies has only begun."
In court filings, Texas has said the buoy system was deployed as part of that strategy to protect against a surge of "[t]housands of aliens ... including members of cartels that traffic in people, weapons, and vast quantities of drugs like fentanyl."
MORE: Federal judge orders buoys in Rio Grande moved to Texas riverbank
"By any account, this amounts to 'ent[ry] in a hostile manner.' And the State has the constitutional power to repel that invasion," the state said.
But the judge ruled Texas' "'invasion' defense" is a political question -- not a legal one -- and that even if there were an "invasion" at the Southern border, as they've claimed, then protecting American shores would be the province of the federal government, not Texas.
Ezra, appointed by President Ronald Reagan and serving since 1988, said there are "several constitutional provisions" which "assign the federal government—not states—the authority to recognize and respond to invasions," and "the political question doctrine bars consideration of Texas's 'invasion' defense."
"Texas's self defense argument is unconvincing," the judge wrote.
MORE: 2 bodies found in Rio Grande near US-Mexico border: Officials
Though the Lonestar State has repeatedly asserted its sovereignty to defend the border, federal "power to prevent unauthorized obstacles in the nation's navigable waters trumps state policy preferences," the judge said.
The judge rejected not only Texas' claims of authority to install the 1,000-foot-long, four-foot-wide chain of interconnected buoys in the Rio Grande -- but also the way they attempted to characterize that buoy system.
Texas takes the "confusing stance" that the buoys can't be a "structure" (which, in navigable U.S. water, would require an Army Corps of Engineers permit) because buoys "aid navigation," the judge wrote, quoting the state's arguments.
But this is a "convenient" claim from Texas that "contradicts its own description," the judge wrote -- since the state had said the buoys were designed as a "physical barrier" created "to deter illegal crossing in hotspots along the Rio Grande."
"Texas strains credulity with its argument that the floating barrier is not permanent enough to constitute a structure," the judge wrote.
Questions also remain as to how the vast majority of Texas' buoy barriers wound up on Mexico's side of the river, the judge said.
In August, the Justice Department submitted a binational topographic survey, conducted in late July, which found that nearly 80 percent of the barrier was positioned in Mexican waters. A few days later, Texas was "observed seemingly 'repositioning the Floating Barrier' closer to the United States bank," a footnote in the judge's ruling says.
At a hearing, "testimony was elicited that the buoys were moved back into Texas waters. Testimony was also elicited that the buoys could not have drifted," the judge wrote. "But in a statement on August 21, 2023, Governor Abbott indicated that they had drifted."
"There is still some ambiguity as to whether 80% of the buoys ended up in Mexican waters by drifting or by being originally, incorrectly installed there," the judge wrote.
veryGood! (2558)
Related
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Ohio Woman, 23, Sentenced to 15 Years to Life in Prison For Stabbing Mom Over College Suspension
- Judge threatens to hold Donald Trump in contempt after deleted post is found on campaign website
- Well-known mountaineer falls to her death into crevasse on Mount Dhaulagiri, the world's 7th-highest peak
- Kansas City Chiefs CEO's Daughter Ava Hunt Hospitalized After Falling Down a Mountain
- 5 Things podcast: Orthodox church in Gaza City bombed; Biden urges support for Israel
- Fired at 50, she felt like she'd lost everything. Then came the grief.
- Billie Eilish Addresses Her Relationship Status Amid Dating Speculation
- Shilo Sanders' bankruptcy case reaches 'impasse' over NIL information for CU star
- This flesh-eating parasite spread by sand flies has foothold in U.S., appears to be endemic in Texas, CDC scientists report
Ranking
- Blake Lively’s Inner Circle Shares Rare Insight on Her Life as a Mom to 4 Kids
- 'My body is changed forever.' Black women lead way for FDA chemical hair straightener ban
- A new memoir serves up life lessons from a childhood in a Detroit Chinese restaurant
- Virginia NAACP sues Youngkin for records behind the denials of felons’ voting rights
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Nigerians remember those killed or detained in the 2020 protests against police brutality
- Cricket in the Olympics? 2028 Games will feature sport for the first time in a century
- The White House details its $105 billion funding request for Israel, Ukraine, the border and more
Recommendation
Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
Get $90 Worth of Olaplex Hair Products for Just $63
Chicago and police union reach tentative deal on 20% raise for officers
How Brooklyn Beckham Really Feels About Haters Who Criticize His Cooking Videos
Tropical rains flood homes in an inland Georgia neighborhood for the second time since 2016
Defendant in classified docs case waives conflict of interest concerns
A man, a plan, a chainsaw: How a power tool took center stage in Argentina’s presidential race
Rafah border remains closed amid mounting calls for Gaza aid: Reporter's notebook