Current:Home > MarketsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -MoneyStream
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-13 09:47:54
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (3678)
Related
- British golfer Charley Hull blames injury, not lack of cigarettes, for poor Olympic start
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- NCAA President Charlie Baker would be 'shocked' if women's tournament revenue units isn't passed
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
Ranking
- Giants, Lions fined $200K for fights in training camp joint practices
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
Recommendation
The seven biggest college football quarterback competitions include Michigan, Ohio State
Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
Your Wedding Guests Will Thank You if You Get Married at These All-Inclusive Resorts
B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam